Sunday, May 10, 2009

GLOBAL ETHANOL INDUSTRY

Across the world, USA is the largest ethanol producing country with a contribution of 39% to the global production. Brazil comes second, with a contribution of 31% to global production. However, despite Brazil’s second position, its ethanol industry is more prosperous than US corn-based ethanol industry due to appropriate, cheaper, and efficient feedstock (sugarcane) selection. The basic cause for the ailing condition of the US ethanol industry during 2008 was the skyrocketing corn price that touched USD 7 per bushel, which drastically reduced producers’ profitability even after the incentives and subsidies provided by the US Government. US charges import tariff of around 40-55% on Brazilian ethanol to make Brazilian's ethanol price competitive with US ethanol, which indicates the incompetence and ineffectiveness of the US ethanol industry. The price of corn is expected to drop by almost 14.5% from the baseline level and the loss of demand subsidies would cause the price of ethanol to drop by 18.6%. The fuel price is expected to increase by 0.2%; domestic ethanol production would drop by 11.5%; ethanol imports would increase by 28.1%; total gasoline supply would increase by 0.5%; and total fuel demand would remain almost unchanged from baseline levels. On average, 82% of ethanol plants would be operating in this scenario. The average net welfare gain from removing all ethanol policies would be USD 5.8 billion. The expected producer surplus of the biggest winner, gasoline suppliers, would increase by USD 5.05 billion. Average government revenue would increase by USD 4.9 billion. Corn growers and ethanol producers would lose USD 9.4 billion and USD 2.65 billion in average producer surplus, respectively.

2 comments:

  1. Hi, what I feel is that instead of campaigning on ethanol it is better to develop other cost effective technologies such as biomass gasification since the gasification is much faster and its conversion efficiency is more than that of ethanol from fermentation. Commenting more technically, gasification process can bye-pass the food vs fuel debate since the 'biomass' used for gasification can be of lignocellulosic origin which is not involved in the 'food chain' of majority of life forms in this 'blue planet'.

    ANAND R.S.
    Dept. of Biotechnology
    SVCE
    India

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mr Ananad, Your point on food Vs fuel debate is absolutely correct, mostly when corn is used for ethanol production.In past, it has increased price of many food items in US.And, If you talk on the technology, even ethanol industry has lots of space for technology improvements.In fact other than the corn based ethanol, peoples are really looking for the more efficient alternatives like Husk,biomass gasification etc to produce ethanol. But, the only problem with all these are the technology viability, which will take a decade time for any alternative to come up on the commercial level.
    Rupesh Ranjan
    Research Analyst
    (Author of Article)

    ReplyDelete